In Dallas, the strategy stood out for translating stakeholder input into highly specific, actionable priorities. Rather than broad themes, the project identified clear gaps—such as the mismatch between the perceived importance and performance of public schools, infrastructure, and housing—and tied them directly to economic competitiveness. 

Backed by detailed economic modeling, including IRS migration flows and granular cost comparisons, the plan created a precise, data-driven foundation for policy reform, cross-sector coordination, and a more intentional citywide economic identity.